Paddle Comparison
CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 vs Selkirk Boomstik ST
The CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 carries a clear SW advantage — 117.75 versus 0 on the Selkirk Boomstik ST — a 117.75-point gap that means noticeably heavier drives and more power from the TruFoam Genesis 3.
Who wins on what
Power
CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3
Higher Swing Weight (power) (117.75 vs 0, +117.75)
Hand Speed
Selkirk Boomstik ST
Lower Swing Weight (hand speed) (117.75 vs 0)
Sweet Spot / Forgiveness
CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3
Higher Twist Weight (forgiveness) (6.26 vs 0, +6.26)
Side-by-side specs
Brand
Model
Shape
Thickness
Weight
Swing Weight
Twist Weight
Play Style
Retail Price
Discount
Effective Price
See more comparisons like this — straight to your inbox
Weekly paddle picks, fresh comparisons, and exclusive discount codes.
Unsubscribe anytime · No spam · Free forever
Which paddle should you buy?
Pick the CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 if…
- You want more power — SW 117.75 is 117.75 points higher.
- You want a bigger sweet spot — TW 6.26 is more forgiving on off-center hits.
- Your game leans all-court — this is tuned for that style.
Pick the Selkirk Boomstik ST if…
- You want faster hands — lower SW (0 vs 117.75) means quicker maneuvering at the kitchen.
- Your game leans power — this is tuned for that style.
Frequently asked questions
Is the CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 or the Selkirk Boomstik ST better for power?
The CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 generates more power — SW 117.75 vs 0 on the Selkirk Boomstik ST, a 117.75-point gap that adds mass and momentum at contact. If you prioritize hand speed and maneuverability over raw power, the Boomstik ST's lower swing weight is the advantage.
Related comparisons
Compare other paddles in our database