Paddle Comparison
Luzz Cannon XPP vs Selkirk Boomstik ST
The Luzz Cannon XPP carries a clear SW advantage — 120.94 versus 0 on the Selkirk Boomstik ST — a 120.94-point gap that means noticeably heavier drives and more power from the Cannon XPP.
Who wins on what
Power
Luzz Cannon XPP
Higher Swing Weight (power) (120.94 vs 0, +120.94)
Hand Speed
Selkirk Boomstik ST
Lower Swing Weight (hand speed) (120.94 vs 0)
Sweet Spot / Forgiveness
Luzz Cannon XPP
Higher Twist Weight (forgiveness) (6.24 vs 0, +6.24)
Side-by-side specs
Brand
Model
Shape
Thickness
Weight
Swing Weight
Twist Weight
Play Style
Retail Price
Discount
Effective Price
See more comparisons like this — straight to your inbox
Weekly paddle picks, fresh comparisons, and exclusive discount codes.
Unsubscribe anytime · No spam · Free forever
Which paddle should you buy?
Pick the Luzz Cannon XPP if…
- You want more power — SW 120.94 is 120.94 points higher.
- You want a bigger sweet spot — TW 6.24 is more forgiving on off-center hits.
Pick the Selkirk Boomstik ST if…
- You want faster hands — lower SW (0 vs 120.94) means quicker maneuvering at the kitchen.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Luzz Cannon XPP or the Selkirk Boomstik ST better for power?
The Luzz Cannon XPP generates more power — SW 120.94 vs 0 on the Selkirk Boomstik ST, a 120.94-point gap that adds mass and momentum at contact. If you prioritize hand speed and maneuverability over raw power, the Boomstik ST's lower swing weight is the advantage.
Related comparisons
Compare other paddles in our database